7 msgBootstrap failure for current gcc trunk on cygw...
1 msgvolunteer to help with Fortran
2 msgRe: A recent patch increased GCC's memory consu...
1 msgProgram za knjigovodstvo sa PDV-om
7 msgWhere is gstdint.h
1 msgvisailu
1 msgoopsie, bootstrap comparison failure
3 msgmaybe_infinite_loop?
3 msgHow do you get the benefit of -fstrict-aliasing?
1 msggcc-4.3-20070420 is now available
6 msgGCC mini-summit - Patch tracker
5 msgtuples: initial infrastructure
11 msgDoes vectorizer support extension?
7 msgRe: assign numbers to warnings; treat selected ...
2 msg[M32C] Incorrect Frame information generated
3 msgarm,gcc and dsp instructions
8 msgNew option: -fstatic-libgfortran
63 msgGCC mini-summit
3 msgProblem building gcc on Cygwin

why no $pc offset in debug CFA?
\ DJ Delorie (19 Apr 2007)
. \ Eric Botcazou (19 Apr 2007)
. \ Richard Henderson (19 Apr 2007)

Subject:why no $pc offset in debug CFA?
Group:Gcc
From:DJ Delorie
Date:19 Apr 2007



In dwarf2out.c : dwarf2out_frame_init we have this code:

#ifdef DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO
if (DWARF2_UNWIND_INFO)
initial_return_save (INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX);
#endif

However, gdb really needs that slot to unwind stack frames when
debugging, on targets that don't use dwarf2 unwinding (i.e. cygwin
with -gdwarf-2, and some embedded targets that still use sjlj). Why
don't we unconditionally emit this?


© 2004-2008 readlist.com