RE: What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS?

1 msg	The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.15 is released
2 msg	Can I have a more detailed documentation about ...
8 msg	gcc preprocessor
4 msg	[DataFlow Branch] Query regarding an ICE in glo...

What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS?
\ Andrew Marlow (18 Apr 2007)
. \ Dave Korn (18 Apr 2007)
. \ Andrew Marlow (18 Apr 2007)
. \ Dave Korn (18 Apr 2007)

15 msg	HTML of -fdump-tree-XXXX proposal.
1 msg	regression hunt tools
1 msg	Recommend lecture about the meaning of PHI func...
5 msg	Segfault on OpenMP program
2 msg	TREE_CODE: arrays and variables
48 msg	GCC -On optimization passes: flag and doc issues
6 msg	REG_NO_CONFLICT vs lower-subreg
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070416 is now available
2 msg	Potential bug with g++ and OpenMP
12 msg	Builtin functions?
7 msg	Duplicate assembler function names in cgraph
8 msg	[cygwin] Can't boostrap current gcc trunk with ...
3 msg	Difference in DWARF Info generated by GCC 3.4.6...
8 msg	EH references
1 msg	generated files vs bootstrapping [Was: GCC 4.2....

Subject:	RE: What are the chances of GCC for PRIMOS?
Group:	Gcc
From:	Dave Korn
Date:	18 Apr 2007

On 18 April 2007 11:00, Andrew Marlow wrote:

[ list Cc'd back in as I see you sent this reply there as well as off-list ]

>> But the
>> odds of some random gcc hacker with no special interest in
>> PRIMOS suddenly deciding to volunteer that amount of time and
>> effort for no reason are ... small.
>
> Er, yes. I don't have the skills myself. I was hoping that maybe some
> ex-primates hung around in the GCC ml. Perhaps this was wildly optimistic.

Not /wildly/ optimistic, but optimistic yes. There are quite a lot of
pretty old-school big iron guys among the older crew, as it happens. Even so,
they'd have to be pretty keen to want to do this work...

> There may be some chance of this. In comp.sys.prime it was just announced
> that the source for a very early unofficial version of the C compiler has
> been found. I wonder if this might be a useful starting point. Does this ml
> have a pointer (URL maybe) for any GCC implementing a new backend
> documentation that I can point my fellow primates to? Maybe one of them
> could use this info in conjunction with the source that was just
> discovered.

The main documentation is the gcc internals manual:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/, other formats available at
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/. After that, the next step is to look at the
other backend ports, pick one that's architecturally close to your target, and
study how it makes things work. See also http://gcc.gnu.org/readings.html,
particularly HP's "Porting gcc for dunces".

There's no chance the code of the old compiler will be /directly/ useful in
a gcc context, but much of the information it tells you will surely be vital.

>>> There is an emerald here the size of a plover's egg!
>> plugh!
>
> Nothing happens.

A hollow voice says "Well, I wasn't really expecting it to work here
anyway."

cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....