Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions.

2 msg	Best of luck for GSoC 2007 participants!
4 msg	anyone using svk?
2 msg	FW: [M16C] : 20 bit data pointer
3 msg	Re: Toolchain for Maverick Crunch FPU
5 msg	Re : Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM ...
4 msg	peephole patterns are not matching
2 msg	Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb...
5 msg	adding dependence from prefetch to load
8 msg	Recent dataflow branch SPEC2000 benchmarking
1 msg	PHI_NODE memory reduction, WAS: Re: RFC: GIMPLE...

A microoptimization of isnegative or greatertha...
\ J.C. Pizarro (10 Apr 2007)
. \ J.C. Pizarro (10 Apr 2007)
. \ Ian Lance Taylor (10 Apr 2007)
. . \ J.C. Pizarro (10 Apr 2007)

68 msg	RFC: GIMPLE tuples. Design and implementation p...
1 msg	gcc-4.1-20070409 is now available
2 msg	Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved? E...
14 msg	Inclusion in an official release of a new throw...
5 msg	Generating RTL for function call sequences from...
11 msg	Re: Integer overflow in operator new. Solved?
2 msg	static symbol occurs twice in the executable.
4 msg	Miscompilation...
1 msg	VCG viewer...

Subject:	Re: A microoptimization of isnegative or greaterthan2millions.
Group:	Gcc
From:	J.C. Pizarro
Date:	10 Apr 2007

10 Apr 2007 10:53:08 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <iant> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, you are recommending that gcc generate a
> different code sequence than it currently does. The most helpful
> approach you can use for such a suggestion is to open a bug report
> marked as an enhancement. See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html.
>
> Postings to gcc are not wrong, but they will almost
> certainly get lost. An entry in the bug database will not get lost.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Ian
>
Thanks, bug reported as enhancement in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31531