4 msgStatic Chain Argument in call_expr

MODIFY_EXPR lhs
\ Paulo J. Matos (8 Mar 2007)

5 msgLibiberty functions
13 msgLooking for specific pages from Muchnick's book
1 msggcc-4.2-20070307 is now available
6 msgDetemining the size of int_fast8_t etc. in the ...
5 msgApple's Objective-C 2.0 extensions
1 msglibg2c.a missing in 4.1.1
1 msgContinuous run-time adaptation and optimization...
1 msgGCC Interactive Compilation Interface development
3 msgbuild broken
1 msgDoxygen documentation nearly unreadable
5 msgBUG: wrong function call
21 msgAdding a new gcc dir
3 msgMainline bug in RTL fwprop.
1 msggcc-4.1-20070305 is now available
4 msggcc and gmp/mpfr - order of build
9 msgSigned overflow patches OK for 4.2?
1 msgquestion about PASSES
7 msgsubreg pass
Subject:MODIFY_EXPR lhs
Group:Gcc
From:Paulo J. Matos
Date:8 Mar 2007


Hello,

Why is it that a left hand side of a modify_expr usually had void_type
while other times it has integer, real or something else _type? One
pattern I'm detecting is that when the lhs is a user variable it has
void type, but when the lhs if a gcc generated variable, the modify
expr has the type of the variable. Is it like that?

Cheers,

--
Paulo Jorge Matos - pocm at soton.ac.uk
http://www.personal.soton.ac.uk/pocm
PhD Student @ ECS
University of Southampton, UK


© 2004-2008 readlist.com