1 msgRETRACTED: Precompiled headers making for some ...
3 msgcan i cross compile glibc then copy it to the h...
1 msgPrecompiled headers making for some odd trouble...

Similarities between gcc and binutils
\ NightStrike (28 Jun 2007)
. \ Brian Dessent (28 Jun 2007)
. . \ NightStrike (28 Jun 2007)

1 msgTracking down a difference in test_results for ...
2 msgautovectorization and aligned access
3 msgany companies provide services for building gcc...
2 msgSolaris 64 bit build environment
9 msgQuestion on warnings for compiling gcc from svn...
4 msgHow to use GCC testsuite..?
3 msgoption to see the Intermediate repersantation (...
4 msgc++ const aggregate vs constructor
2 msgvarargs
1 msgRe: relation between gcc/glibc version and linu...
3 msgThe (black?) art of inlining...
3 msgorder of -L options created by gcc for the linker
1 msgloop peeling in autovectorization
3 msgBuilding gcc 4.2.0 cross-compiler (host=i386-ap...
5 msgBuilding only C++ libraries
1 msgCan we use GCC testsuite to test other C compil...
Subject:Re: Similarities between gcc and binutils
Group:Gcc-help
From:NightStrike
Date:28 Jun 2007


On 6/27/07, Brian Dessent <brian> wrote:
> NightStrike wrote:
>
> > I recently submitted my first bug and patch to gcc
> > (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32532), and it dealt with
> > an unused variable in libiberty/argv.c. I just found out that the
> > same condition exists at the same line in the same file for binutils.
> > Are these files supposed to be in sych somehow? Am I supposed to
> > submit the bug to both products?
>
> No. The gcc copy of libiberty is the master; whoever commits the patch
> to the gcc tree is supposed to commit it to the src tree too at the same
> time (or find someone to do it for them.)

Ok, so my work should be done, then, for the bug I submitted, correct?

Thanks to all helping out. Obviously this is beyond trivial, but it
provides a good learning ground for how I should go about things in
the future. Ditto for anyone reading these threads.


© 2004-2008 readlist.com