|
| | Subject: | Re: constructors/destructors compiled twice | | Group: | Gcc-help | | From: | Kövesdi György | | Date: | 22 Jun 2007 |
> Hm... This brings a pragmatic alternative into my mind:
> Instead of having multiple names for the same function body gcc could
> still generate distinct functions at different adresses that just jmp to
> the identical parts of the code.
Yes, it would be reasonable even for smaller embedded systems. It hits my
fancy.
Regards
K. Gy.
|