Re: From what versions of binutils, gcc, and glibc did '--with-sysroot' become available ??

2 msg	Linking problem gcj and c++
2 msg	Error building gcc/g++ 4.1.1 on AIX 5.2
6 msg	Optimizing constructors/destructors for embedde...
8 msg	Help compiling 4.3.0
2 msg	GCC with __asm__ generic temporary register query
5 msg	Does GCC assign any type to enums that can be s...
1 msg	Macros for function definitions/calls
8 msg	typedef conflict in GCC and JAVA
1 msg	does gcc 2.95.3 support softfloat ?
17 msg	Help compiling gcc 4.2.0
2 msg	Fwd: Locale problem / debugging libstdc++
2 msg	arm-elf make check fixincludes failures
1 msg	reordering of passes

From what versions of binutils, gcc, and glibc ...
\ Hayden Thring (21 Jun 2007)
. \ David Daney (21 Jun 2007)
. . \ Hayden Thring (21 Jun 2007)

4 msg	Help configuring gcc
12 msg	constructors/destructors compiled twice
4 msg	Problem building 4.2.0 on Solaris 10 (SPARC)
2 msg	building/installing GCC and crtx.o's confusion
1 msg	mul instruction
1 msg	GCC 4.2.0: optimisation appears to break C++ co...

Subject:	Re: From what versions of binutils, gcc, and glibc did '--with-sysroot' become available ??
Group:	Gcc-help
From:	Hayden Thring
Date:	21 Jun 2007

i need to use gcc 2.95.3 for the 2.4.x kernel sources im working with

at the moment ive been trying with binutils 2.10, but by the sounds of it and from what i read i'd "be better off" using 2.17 ? (assuming this is ok with gcc 2.95.3)

also another question ?

i currently have a native vfp toolchain, and am trying to make a fpa hardfloat toolchain (natively...) , if i compile a new glibc using the "old" toolchain (with a new binutils), will the new glibc see be fpa ?

possibly one knows of a guide for building/installing a secondary glibc ?

regards,
Hayden.

On Wed, 20 Jun 2007 21:40:36 -0700
David Daney <ddaney> wrote:

> Hayden Thring wrote:
> > From what versions of binutils, gcc, and glibc did "--with-sysroot" become available ??
> >
> I may be mistaken, but I think it first appeared in GCC 3.4. It was
> around the same time frame but earlier for binutils, and I don't recall
> that option being applicable for glibc.
> > and can this command work with any of these three apps under a native build ??
> >
> I have never tried it, but it seems likely.
> > also which version of binutils and glibc would one recommend for gcc 2.95.3 ??
> >
> >
> I would try it with current versions. But I would also use a current
> version of GCC.
>
> If current versions don't work for you. Try using the versions that Dan
> Kegel's crosstool uses.
>
> http://kegel.com/crosstool/
>
> David Daney

--
<hjthring>